Rant: The Greatest Progressives Don't Belong (Transcript)
Note: This was originally posted on YouTube and Bitchute, before I had a Rumble channel and Substack; while I don’t dislike Bitchute, I no longer have a Bitchute channel because they banned me for leaving up one video directing people to my Rumble channel, which not even YouTube did, and is surprising, given how much more censorious YouTube generally is. In the original video I said “critical theory” and I’ve corrected that in the transcript with “critical theories”.
Also, while I am deeply and unapologetically anti-equity and pro-merit, I do regret using the word stupid and should’ve said ignorant; I’m generally trying to avoid polemics since it’s generally bad for innovative conversation, and that was me doing my best to while upset. However, I’m not apologizing for the “F” word because I like using it as an occasional adjective, maybe in the same way that an adult eats a cookie or a piece of cake and only regrets it during the periods of subsequent noticeable inflammation and fucking illness.
Okay, so I’ve been shadowbanned on YouTube, and I always had a suspicion of this, but I just found proof. So I want to post this.. I’m gonna record this, then talk about it, then I’m going to post it on both YouTube and Bitchute. I’m gonna start a Bitchute channel, and I may post more videos on Bitchute after this because I’m getting really fed up. And it’s getting to a point where we have to speak up against this (censorship) because too many people have gotten too stupid, and what do I mean by that? Because that alone is an appeal to emotion logical fallacy so what do I mean by that? Too many people have lost the ability to think probabilistically past the point of language and culture when it is convenient for wokeness (critical theories) to disrupt probabilistic thinking to stop threats to the (woke) ideology; because they’ve been trained by radical academic liberals to see language and culture as totally relative like the post-modernists believed.
And then further from that, they take it into a postmodern activism which is critical theories or wokeness; and which ties into the history of Marxism or Communism.. if you look into Bella Dodd, who was a devout communist, where they used language to divide people in order to expand the government and eliminate freedoms, which inevitably which inevitably eliminated human rights; (and) it’s happening now. So here is a video by the Ad Council, and it's got 614 dislikes (in comparison to 1,300 likes showing some significant pushback); so I want to say there’s nothing wrong with belonging, there’s nothing wrong with different races, genders, or sexual orientations, but there’s (destructive communist) symbolism here, symbolism just like people using the word equity in place of the word equality, people using the word inclusion— there’s nothing wrong with inclusion, there’s nothing wrong “Black Lives Matter” (purely as a phrase), there’s nothing wrong with belonging, on the surface, on the surface.. but there’s something underneath, and that’s what you have to understand, (that) you can play with words this way.
You can get everyone involved and then slowly start to guilt-trip them (or convince them with an emotional and improbabilistic (improbable) argument that they are a victim of a conspiracy of systemic subconscious bias), with theories that are improbabilistic, but they aren’t smart enough yet to deduce that they are improbabilistic. They get emotionally hooked by the most common logical fallacy which is the appeal to emotion logical fallacy, sometimes they (woke people) use other common ones like appeal to authority (logical fallacy). So they (the public) get emotionally hooked onto these (woke) arguments, people do on mass, and they lose the classical liberal philosophy which built democratic republics, and civilization to some extent up into its evolution into the democratic republic.
And so now I’m gonna go down, here’s me signed into YouTube, so I wrote (in the comments section of this video), “Marxist philosophy has achieved moral symbol/language- bending brainwashing on an unconscious level in modern-day America as it has historically..” And I was referencing Bella Dodd there, which I learned about that from James Lindsay’s New Discourses YouTube channel. So to go on with my comment.. “..so belonging is good but woke-infested belonging is a mirage, and the people who push these woke-infested moral messages actually promote social division and future genocide of all races with the inevitable endless violence that results from the false belief of cultural and linguistic relativity.”
So before I show you the other sites where my comment is hidden, I’ll go ahead and say real quick, the best book on this subject, on the subject of wokeness or critical theories, and its foundation and the kind of intellectual nihilism of post-modern philosophy which seems to be primarily with the (ironically straight, white, CIS, male) philosophers Derrida and Foucault— and that was taken by radical liberals, radical feminists in academia, which is where this seems to have all started, the best book on the subject is Cynical Theories by James Lindsay and Helen Pluckrose— as far as I’ve seen so far. And I highly recommend that book (if you want more in depth understanding of wokeness).
And so, another thing I want to say before I show you these other sites, real quick, and then I’ll wrap up the video (these other pages were my comments have been deleted, or hidden), is this cultural and linguistic relativity; so probability (deduction) is something that everyone has innate in them to some degree, the ability to deduce evidence-based probability: you want a cheeseburger, McDonald’s is going to be super busy with all the DoorDashers and it’s just opened and such (probably best to look up the McDonald’s human meat thing on Rumble I didn’t know about when I originally made this video), or maybe it was before DoorDash, whatever— but you want a cheeseburger, and Burger King is gonna have way less traffic.. Burger King’s been goin’ downhill lately, but you’re not caring too much about that, so you choose Burger King, so you’ve deduced probability there. It was innate in you, it’s innate in everyone to some degree.
So since it’s innate in everyone that’s a probabilistic universal truth, okay? So when you get up to culture and language and you say, well these are relative, and it’s all just social group battles for power.. you completely eliminate the concept of love as anything other than a power struggle. We basically eliminated this ability to deduce probability on a level past anything that wokeness determines it’s dangerous to deduce probability for.
To clarify: Woke linguistic/cultural relativity is applied to any perceived threats to wokeness, otherwise some amount of probability deduction/critical-thinking can exist where it is not a sufficient threat to wokeness (for example: “Where can I get a cheeseburger the fastest?”). This makes the entire ideology illogical and paradoxical , because there is the conflict between linguistic/cultural relativity, and activism to balance out the perception of reality as existing around group power struggles; this fundamental conflict in wokeness is ignored using a perpetual framing of people into oppressor or victim categories, that are more important than the probability deduction/critical-thinking that is labeled oppressive. (The following are threats to wokeness.) So that includes meritocracy, that includes the scientific method, that includes traditional moral values or virtues, that includes any kind of ideas which lead us closer towards civilization, and closer towards the best probabilistic version of civilization that we have right now, which is a democratic republic.
I just wanted to say that, so now we’re gonna go to.. let’s see.. this is just a private web browser, web page.. it’s sorted by “Newest (comments) first”. Right there you have my comment’s nowhere to be found. Here is a Tor browser (appearing from another place on Earth), I’m not sure if DE is Denmark I think? I’m not positive on that. Sorted by “Newest first”, see I’m not there. So if this was deleted, if my comment was totally deleted, I wouldn’t see it in my signed-in browser.. you see, I see it (there); so that’s what shadowbanning is, and that is a form of gaslighting.. it’s a form of.. I think you could call it psychological manipulation (or psychological abuse).
But Google used to say “Don’t be evil.” Now they’ve turned evil. They’ve been totally brainwashed, along with many people across the world, by wokeness, or critical theories, or applied post-modernism, or activist post-modernism.. so it’s getting to a point we no longer have freedom of speech on any major social media website, and these people need to be called out. Because they can’t be allowed to destroy civilization because they lack probabilistic thinking— the pursuit of unbiased probabilistic thinking, with respect for the unknown.
But the respect for the unknown doesn’t cancel out that pursuit, because that’s the best method we have for making social change— for making positive social change in any arena. And so, these people have abandoned liberalism, they call themselves progressives.. but the greatest progressives are always alone, because they seek probabilistic wisdom over social belonging, and the two have a historical conflict in every human being; so don’t let these people fool you into calling them progressives, because a progressive doesn’t fucking belong. Okay? The best progressives don’t belong, they never belong. They’re always progressing, and that’s why they don’t belong.
And that’s all I want to say on that.
Video: https://rumble.com/vvtobx-the-greatest-progressives-dont-belong.html